E-Rate

E-Rate Funding Year 2025-2026 - RFPs

Monrovia USD is seeking the following:

 

Category 2 - MUSD UPS Refresh

 
Fill out our Request for Information Form if you have questions about the RFP and need clarification.

 
All responses to question will be posted on this website. Please check back frequently for updates.


The following questions have been asked:

1) Are patch cables required for the SNMP cards? If so what length?
No, patch cables are not required.

2) The RFP states prevailing wage labor rates are required for this project. Can you clarify which determination and whether you require shift 1 or shift 2 rates?
Please refer to the determination as listed in Section K of the "Service Provider Questionnaire" in the RFP as it refers to the California Labor Code Sections.
Shift 1 or shift 2 is determined upon whether school/classes are in session during installation.
-------- THE ITEMS BELOW THIS LINE ARE PRIOR YEAR RFPS ------------

E-Rate Year 27 (2024-2025) - RFPs

 

Monrovia USD is seeking the following:

 

Category 1 - MUSD Wide Area Network Services

 
Fill out our Request for Information Form if you have questions about the RFP and need clarification.

 
All responses to question will be posted on this website. Please check back frequently for updates. 

E-Rate Year 26 (2023-2024) - RFPs

 

Monrovia USD is seeking the following:

 

Category 1 - MUSD Internet Access

 
Fill out our Request for Information Form if you have questions about the RFP and need clarification.

 
All responses to question will be posted on this website. Please check back frequently for updates. 

Category 1 - Internet Service Provider - RFP M-20-201 Internet Service Provider
 
1. Regarding Canyon Oaks High School, 930 Royal Oaks Dr, Monrovia, CA 91016 - Do you have the latitude/longitude for the High School? We are unable to use mapping software to determine a Building or MPOE. The only building we see is the Monrovia Adult School in proximity to the address.
It is the same building as Monrovia Adult School.
 
2. In Reference to RFP 20.201 you are requesting to have an "Excel Spreadsheet" uploaded to a USB Drive when the RFP pricing is submitted. However, there is not one provided in the RFP Document on Page 3. Do we create our own Excel Spreadsheet for the pricing piece and attaché to the document when we submit?
No Excel Spreadsheet needed. That was for the RFP M-20-202 Switches and AIO Wireless. Providing pricing on your own sheet.
 
Category 2 - MUSD Switches and AIO Wireless - RFP M-20-202 Switches and AIO Wireless
 
1. On page 4, it states the service provider must be Cisco Gold. Is Cisco Premier acceptable?
Refer back to page 4 seeking proposals from Cisco Gold partner.
 
2. On page 11, which license would you like with the C9500-40X-A? EDU or DNA?
Either.  Refer to Page 12. As long as it "include Layer 3 Routing such that the servers and storage
array are still functional in the event the Cisco Meraki core switches are down."
There are no addendum to this RFP.
 
A few questions have been asked. The answers below should clarify them: 
 
1. Does your cold spare need to have the 10G Fiber interfaces or are you OK with pulling out the interfaces from the primary box and installing in the cold spare?
Yes, that's why we didn't ask for them.

2. In the RFP, you mentioned that you’re looking for FW throughput of 6 Gbps or greater. Is this requirement based on datasheet performance numbers or real-world numbers? Is this 6 Gbps requirement for firewall only or with all of the features enabled? There’s a big discrepancy between datasheet and real-world performance numbers. Datasheet performance numbers are based on lab "ideal conditions" with 1 rule (any/any) with logging turned off and no NAT's so the datasheet numbers (for all vendors) are going to be much higher than "real world" when all features are enabled.
The number is based on the Cisco Meraki MX450 datasheet. The District understands that datasheet performance numbers is different from real-world numbers, which is why we asked for Cisco Meraki MX450 or equivalent and not the Cisco Meraki MX400. Any equivalent solution proposed should ideally be equal to or greater than the Cisco Meraki MX450 with the features we're asking for in the RFP.
 

3. In the RFP, you mentioned that you’re looking for anti-malware as part of the solution. Do you want to include a zero-day/sandboxing solution?
We didn't ask for it, so no. It would be nice to see it as an option. 

4. Why would you want a VPN box at a second location?
We don't, and the RFP does not call for a VPN box at a second location. I believe it was talked about during the bidder's conference that it would be nice to have capability to add a VPN box at a later time, but it is not required for the purpose of this RFP.
 

Evaluation Matrices